Implementing and testing constitutional AI methodology in operational environments with measurable evaluation frameworks.
Testing Constitutional Synthesis at Scale
Smart-Trends.io produces daily structured intelligence reports that serve as a live evaluation environment for testing constitutional synthesis, evidence-weighting, and compliance scoring at scale. Processing 5000+ articles daily, the system demonstrates our methodology in operation—not as a prototype, but as a working implementation under continuous evaluation.
Constitutional Compliance Testing
Real-world evaluation of principle adherence at scale
Source Attribution Framework
Testing attribution coverage and accuracy measurement
Evidence Weighting Evaluation
Studying source credibility hierarchies in practice
Methodology Transparency
Documented evaluation criteria open to examination
Implementation
7 Constitutional Principles
Scale
5000+ Articles/Day
Purpose
Methodology Validation
Status
Live & Operating
Smart-Trends.io provides a real-world environment for testing constitutional AI methodology at scale. The system enables us to study how weighted principles, evidence-weighting criteria, and evaluation metrics perform under operational conditions.
The system implements our 7 constitutional principles:
We measure constitutional compliance across key dimensions:
The evaluation criteria and source hierarchies used in Smart-Trends.io are documented and open to examination. Our methodology prioritizes sources meeting defined quality criteria including track record, methodology transparency, and institutional accountability. These criteria are subject to revision based on empirical evaluation.
News Sources (5000+ articles/day)
↓
PostgreSQL + pgvector
Vector storage and retrieval
↓
Constitutional Synthesis Engine
Principle application and evaluation
↓
Evaluated Reports
Compliance-scored output
Studying how constitutional frameworks can be parameterized for different domains: legal, regulatory, organizational.
Testing and refining compliance metrics through empirical evaluation across diverse content domains.
Examining how constitutional AI frameworks align with Canadian regulatory and institutional requirements.
Interested in constitutional AI methodology or evaluation frameworks?